Certified Fraud Examiner Practice 2025 - Free Practice Questions and Study Guide

The Daubert Standard focuses on the reliability and relevance of expert testimony within the context of legal proceedings. Established in the 1993 Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., this standard requires that any scientific or technical evidence presented in court must not only be based on methods that are scientifically valid but also directly applicable to the facts of the case at hand.

This means that expert testimony must be grounded in methodologies that have been tested, subjected to peer review, and have a known error rate, ensuring that the methods utilized are generally accepted in the relevant scientific community. Furthermore, the relevance aspect ensures that the testimony must assist the trier of fact in understanding the evidence or determining a fact in issue, making it crucial for the testimony to directly relate to the matter being adjudicated.

The other choices, while they may touch on aspects of expert testimony, do not encapsulate the essence of the Daubert Standard, which is primarily aimed at ensuring that the evidence provided by experts meets stringent criteria for reliability and relevance to serve the interests of justice effectively.