Certified Fraud Examiner Practice 2026 - Free Practice Questions and Study Guide

The term that describes a cross-examination technique aimed at undermining an expert witness is "Expert Discrediting." This technique focuses on challenging the credibility, qualifications, methodologies, or conclusions of the expert witness presented in court. By questioning the expert's reliability and expertise, the cross-examining attorney seeks to diminish the impact of the witness's testimony on the case.

Discrediting an expert can involve examining their educational background, professional experience, or potential biases, as well as scrutinizing the scientific basis or methodologies for their opinions. This strategy ultimately aims to sway the judge or jury's perception of the witness's authority and the value of their testimony, thus influencing the outcome of the case.

The other terms presented do not specifically relate to this technique. Terms like "Myopic Vision," "Blind Spot Analysis," and "Critical Reasoning" don't capture the targeted approach of attempting to undermine an expert's reliability within the context of legal proceedings. Each of these terms may relate to general reasoning or analytical skills, but they lack the focus on discrediting an expert specifically within a courtroom setting.